The short answer is no – as of 2026, Washington State prohibits the sale, possession, and use of armor‑piercing ammunition (APA) for most civilian purposes. While federal law already restricts APA for handguns, Washington’s statutes go further, covering rifles, shotguns, and “any other firearm” unless a specific exemption applies.
State Law Overview
Washington’s primary restriction is found in RCW 9.41.060, which defines “armor‑piercing ammunition” and makes it illegal to manufacture, import, sell, or possess such rounds for non‑law‑enforcement use. The definition mirrors the federal standard in 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(3), focusing on projectiles that can easily penetrate body armor, such as steel‑cored or tungsten‑cored bullets. Violations are classified as a Class C misdemeanor for possession and a Class A misdemeanor for selling or distributing, punishable by up to 364 days in jail and fines up to $5,000.
Federal Interaction
The federal ban, established by the 1994 Federal Assault Weapons Ban and codified in 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(3), prohibits APA in handguns but leaves rifles and shotguns largely unregulated. Washington’s stricter rule fills that gap, creating a “state‑first” regime that supersedes the federal lack of restriction on non‑handgun APA. Consequently, anyone in Washington who possesses APA for a rifle, shotgun, or any firearm other than a law‑enforcement‑authorized handgun can be charged under both state and federal statutes.
Exceptions and Penalties
Certain professionals are exempt, including:
- Law‑enforcement officers acting in official capacity.
- Military personnel on active duty.
- Certified firearms instructors using APA for training approved by the Washington State Police.
If an exempt individual unlawfully transfers APA to a civilian, both parties may face the same misdemeanor penalties. Additionally, repeat offenders can be elevated to a gross misdemeanor, carrying up to 364 days in jail and a $10,000 fine.
Future Outlook 2026
Legislative proposals in the 2025 session aimed to tighten enforcement by requiring background checks for APA transfers, but the bill stalled in committee. Judicial interpretations continue to reinforce the broad definition of APA, with the 2024 Superior Court ruling that “any projectile engineered to defeat standard‑issue body armor falls within the statutory language.” Barring new legislation, the prohibition is expected to remain in force throughout 2026.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is armor‑piercing ammo legal for hunting in Washington?
No. The hunting exemption applies only to non‑APA lead or non‑lead rounds. Using APA while hunting violates RCW 9.41.060 and can lead to misdemeanor charges, irrespective of the game species.
Can I legally own a firearm that was originally sold with APA bullets?
Ownership of the firearm itself is not prohibited, but possessing the APA rounds that were originally packaged with it is illegal unless you have a valid exemption. You must surrender or destroy any APA ammunition found.
How does Washington define “body armor”?
The statute references any commercially available ballistic vest or plate rated to stop handgun or rifle projectiles. The definition aligns with National Institute of Justice standards for Level III or higher armor.
Are “military‑style” rifles automatically banned from using APA?
No. The ban is on the ammunition, not the firearm. A civilian may own an AR‑15‑type rifle, but loading it with steel‑cored or tungsten‑cored bullets without a law‑enforcement exemption is illegal.
What should I do if I unintentionally purchase APA?
Immediately contact the retailer for a return and notify local law enforcement to avoid possession charges. Keeping documentation of the mistake can be helpful if the situation escalates to a legal inquiry.